BEING A READER

On opening Andre Agassi’s ‘Open’

I can’t play tennis for shit. Or money. But I am a committed fan, perhaps one that should be committed. Mornings when I trade the world of dreams where I spend my nights for the world wide web where I spend my days, it’s a toss up between first checking my email, bank balance or the ATP tennis results.

I write for love. And money. Over the years, I’ve spent thousands of hours writing. I’d like to think I got better along the way. That’s the right and proper order of things, that you get better at the things you work hard at. Not being able to play tennis so that I can write seems like a fair trade to me and I assume the opposite also holds true.

My assumptions were challenged, though, when I opened Open, the autobiography of Andre Agassi, who doesn’t need an identifying sub-clause. The part I read was so well written that I wanted to challenge, bring hawkeye into the question to see if that was indeed a fair call. I mean, how can someone who has been one of the world’s top tennis players of the last two, three decades also be such a good writer?

The answer, it turned out, is that he isn’t. He simply picked an excellent ghost-writer in J.R. Moehringer.

While doing this research, I also learned that despite the game’s genteel pretensions, tennis players are on average less educated than all professional sportsmen except boxers. This makes me appreciate Janko Tipsarevich’s Dostoevsky tattoo even more, as well as the decision of Tobias Kamke to finish his degree before turning to tennis full-time. (Good thing too that he has something to fall back on, considering his recent results.) The players who played on the American college circuit presumably did some study as well – John Isner, Kevin Anderson and the like. Perhaps these players can write their own autobiographies one day.

Or perhaps they can just shut up and do what they’re good at.

It is a perplexingly popular assumption that people who have found fame in some human endeavour will also have worthwhile things to say about others. Why should anyone attach importance to what a film star says about climate change, pay attention to a rock singer’s views on global politics, or want to read what novelists say about religion… or sport?

BEING A READER, Crime books

Police procedurals – judging on the evidence

The police procedural, the sub-genre of the crime novel that focuses on the police investigation of crime, has never been high on my agenda. However, on the evidence of Sjöwall and Wahlöö’s excellent Martin Beck books, I was compelled to investigate.

Let’s recap the evidence:

I have now read, in short succession, books by three authors whose names I found a Top Ten list of police procedurals. The H.R. Keating, Reginald Hill and James McClure books were all from the early 1970s. Then I also happened upon a mid-1980s book by A.C. Baantjer, who is apparently the most popular Dutch author in this (or any) genre.

I have written about James McClure’s The Steam Pig elsewhere, so will say no more than he is very good by just about any measure, but this book has not dated well and I expect the same will hold true for the other stories in the series.

Reginald Hill’s heroes are Pascoe and Dalziel, a team I have briefly encountered on television before and who have worked their way through 24 books. The one I read, An Advancement of Learning, was the second in the series and plotted as smartly as one would expect. Like most readers, I read to the end to find out who did what and why.

Unlike most, I suspect, I did not find the experience particularly engrossing. The characters never came alive for me and I found the frightfully British setting… Well, if it had really been frightful, at least it would have elicited an emotion. The book has something of that genteel, Agathie Christie mood which I imagine Miss Marple and her peers may like.

Perhaps Reginald Hill honed his craft as he went along, but I’m content to remain ignorant on that score.

A.C. Baantjer’s book Murder by Instalments is the 22nd in a series that ran to 60 books. No wonder then that it’s written in a perfunctory style. It seems that whenever two bits of dialogue need to be separated, inspector DeKok (“with a kay-oh-kay”) rubs his nose. This, incidentally, is a mannerism he shares with Sjöwall and Wahlöö’s Martin Beck, but Beck at least only does it a handful of times per book. In DeKok’s case, his constant quirks never really add up to a character this reader could connect with.

I have a thing for Amsterdam, especially after reading Janwillem van de Wetering’s superior crime novels of the 1970s. But in Baantjer’s book, I didn’t get that same sense of place. This may have something to do with the particular translation though, where the local flavour of actual street names, for instance, is translated. Changing a name such as Keizersgracht to Emperor’s Canal doesn’t do atmosphere any favours.

Though I got hold of all these books at about the same time, the H.R. Keating one had to wait for last. When I saw it was set in India and had a foreword by Alexander McCall-Smith, I correctly assumed the book to be of the quaint and cute variety. Both these factors put me off. The enjoyment of books is a matter of taste, and this is certainly not my preference. I enjoyed the No.1 Ladies Detective Agency, but one was enough.

However, once I started reading the H.R. Keating book – one of 26 in the series – I couldn’t help but be impressed by the sheer craftsmanship this author displays. Within two or three pages, he established Inspector Ghote as a likeable, human character and dumped him in an awkward and fascinating situation. Very impressive.

Pity the author left the poor cop floundering there for another 150 pages or so. The plot just turned around in place, lacking forward motion or the texture to make up for the lack of form. The denouement, when it came after so much water treading, didn’t convince, even in a genre where believability isn’t usually at a premium. Inspector Ghote came to a firm realisation as to who the culprit was based on evidence as thin as a silk sari. He was then saved by a massive stroke of luck that provided the necessary evidence just as he confronted the suspect.

These disappointments with four highly successful genre authors just drove home the point that it’s authors and books I tend to like, not whole genres.

I read Philip K. Dick and thought I liked science fiction, but actually… no. I like a number of sci-fi authors and books – Cordwainer Smith, William Gibson and J.G. Ballard come to mind – but not the bulk of the genre, not even many of the authors considered best. I read Sjöwall and Wahlöö as well as K.C. Constantine (who does a particularly off-beat take on the police procedural that is all about the police and nothing about the procedure) and thought I might like the genre. I don’t.

What I like about the authors and books I like is far more individual than that. I must confess: I have a weakness for what you might call “the unusual suspects”.

BEING A READER, Crime books

James McClure’s ‘The Steam Pig’ – a great crime novel that grates

James McClure’s first crime novel featuring Lieutenant Tromp Kramer and Constable Mickey Zondi, The Steam Pig, appears on a couple of Top Ten lists for police procedurals. The setting, like that of my first crime story, is South Africa. So I was very keen to read the book. Doing so, however, wasn’t the unmitigated pleasure I had hoped for. The reasons are complex.

It is clear from the first line that McClure is a witty writer: For an undertaker George Henry Abbott was a sad man.

If that’s not a great first line, I don’t what is. The Steam Pig has a great many equally delightful sentences and some wonderful twists, though partly offsetby a few plodding passages. And how often does it happen that the title of the book itself delivers a kick to the gut, once the reader catches its meaning?

The plot is an impressive achievement, becoming even more so in retrospect. It runs rings around the vast majority of crime novels and, impressively, does so without losing credibility. The motivations and chain of events are both amazing and utterly believable.

The characters are great, and not only Kramer and Zondi. Many of the minor characters are vividly imagined and drawn with unexpected insight.

Given all these positives, why do I have such misgivings?

There are a few superficial irritations, for instance the repeated misspelling of Afrikaans character and street names. One character, clearly meant to be Jannie Koekemoer, has both his name and surname spelled wrong – Janie Koekemoor. Though this kind of thing is unnecessarily sloppy, international readers wouldn’t know and perhaps even the readers who do notice wouldn’t care the way I do.

More of an issue is the rampant racism of the characters. I found this hard to take, but perhaps I am oversensitive to this because of my personal history, having lived in South Africa for most of my life.

The book is set in the late 1960s, with apartheid showing no signs of cracking. In fact, this is reportedly one of the reasons James McClure decided to leave South Africa in the mid-Sixties – he was drawing unwelcome attention from the state security apparatus. This book was written at the end of the decade, from the author’s new home in the UK.

By the way, expat Southern African crime writers could be a good area of study for some aspiring academic, with highly regarded Australian crime writer Peter Temple and Alexander McCall Smith of No.1 Ladies Detective Agency fame also born in the region. There are probably more.

But back to James McClure. As always, it would be wrong to ascribe his characters’ or even narrator’s point of view to the author. While it could be that the racism of the time was so insidious that it even contaminated the thinking of its opponents, the author deserves the benefit of the doubt. The racism in the book is not his.

In fact, the Kramer-Zondi series was in all likelihood purposely written as an exposé of apartheid. Issues of race and the legislation of the time provide key plot points in The Steam Pig – the story would’ve been unthinkable anywhere else or at any other time.

And in a way this very fact undermines the book for modern readers.

While many crime books set in earlier decades and exotic locations remained current and relevant, James McClure’s book hasn’t. The kind of thing the reader experiences as local or historical colour in books as varied as those by Raymond Chandler, Andrea Camilleri or Sjöwall and Wahlöö become a hindrance in The Steam Pig. There are too many references and motivations that only make sense in that particular environment and to informed readers.

It’s hard to appreciate the story without knowing that the Group Areas Act assigned different residential areas to each race, the Immorality Act outlawed sex between people of different races or that people could be born in one race and then be reassigned to another based on the kinkiness of their hair or some other potentially spurious characteristic – a decision that forces those affected to move house, change schools, lose their friends, change their salary and career prospects, and force them to use different public amenities from transport to toilets.

The setting of The Steam Pig is not only unfamiliar to modern readers, but almost unimaginable… even for someone who had experienced it first hand.

(Or do I find it unimaginable precisely because I had experienced it? There may be some psychological force at work that cannot allow me to acknowledge the insanity of the times I had witnessed and keep my own sanity. But that’s something for another day, another couch.)

My evaluation of James McClure’s The Steam Pig may be unduly coloured by personal experience. While I have no intention of reading another of his books, others should probably find one of this author’s books to read and make up their own mind. James McClure is a very good writer burdened with unpopular subject matter.